Concept proposal · For consideration

Made in Jordan Export House

  • Tier 2
  • Years 2–3
  • concept — not funded

A shared U.S. fulfillment and wholesale node for Jordanian consumer brands — contracted with existing 3PLs, anchored in Chicago, not an owned warehouse.

01

The challenge — and the evidence of demand

The largest post-entry bottleneck for Jordanian SMEs is not production or regulation but logistics: with no U.S. inventory position, delivery is slow, wholesale accounts are lost and e-commerce is uncompetitive. Three models were costed: a dedicated Jordanian-owned facility (about $580K per year fixed, breaking even only above roughly 8,000–9,700 orders per month), a 3PL-contracted node (about $170K per year fixed, break-even at roughly 350–590 orders per month or about 15 members at $600 per month), and a virtual network (cheapest, least control). The diaspora wholesale channel is fragmented — there is no Patel Brothers-scale Arab grocery chain — which makes a distributor-plus-direct-to-consumer strategy the realistic route to roughly 200–400 independent grocers.

02

The proposed solution

Adopt the 3PL-contract model with a defined graduation trigger: one shared Made-in-Jordan identity — consolidated receiving from Amman flights, co-branded slips, one dock — without owning walls. Anchor in Chicago (direct Amman belly cargo, central two-day ground coverage, the largest Jordanian diaspora cluster, no state inventory tax), with a New Jersey node added at scale. Food-safety and cosmetics warehousing compliance (FDA-registered facilities, temperature discipline, MoCRA verification per brand) is a gate, not an afterthought. Foreign-Trade Zone status remains a later-stage option.

03

Who benefits

Jordan: consumer brands gaining competitive delivery and wholesale reach without real-estate risk. The U.S.: distributors and independent grocers gaining consolidated, compliance-verified supply. The diaspora: retail clusters and gifting channels as natural first demand.

04

Operating model and institutional roles

A professionally run operator (a joint venture of a Jordanian logistics group and a diaspora entrepreneur is the modeled form) holds importer-of-record, FSVP and 3PL master agreements, compensated by member fees and a per-order coordination margin. Two 3PLs from day one to avoid dependency; quarterly rate benchmarking. JEDCO screens exporters and co-funds first-container costs and compliance.

Not yet authorized

05

Economic rationale

All break-even and cost figures are derived estimates from sourced market ranges, labeled as such: about $170K per year fixed for the contract model; fulfillment passed through at about $6.50–8.50 per order before postage; break-even at roughly 350–590 orders per month. The graduation trigger to a dedicated facility is sustained volume above roughly 5,000 orders per month for two consecutive quarters or wholesale pallet volume above about 300 pallets.

Scenario estimate — not a commitment, not a forecast.

Economic impact scenarios

06

Implementation, phase gates and discontinuation criteria

Phase 0 (months 0–3): a virtual pilot — ten brands, marketplace fulfillment plus one distributor plus consolidated Amman–Chicago air consignments. Model-2 launch only after that. Discontinue if orders fall below 150 per month after month 9, fulfillment cost per order sustains above $18 for two quarters, more than two unresolved FDA detentions occur in a quarter, or member retention at renewal falls below 50%.

07

Key performance indicators

Orders per month; fulfillment cost per order (target at or below $8.50 excluding postage); brands onboarded and retained; inventory turns (at or above four); zero unresolved FDA detentions; fill rate (at or above 98%); returns (at or below 8%); wholesale doors (target 150 by month 18).

08

Risks and safeguards

Demand below break-even — the low fixed base and published discontinuation criteria. Food expiry and inventory write-downs — four-times turns, purchase-order financing only for pre-sold orders, Ramadan seasonal planning. 3PL dependency — two providers and quarterly benchmarking. Product liability — umbrella policy, member indemnities and lot traceability.

09

Status

  • concept — not funded
  • Not yet authorized

All initiatives and the tier architecture · Economic impact scenarios · Governance · Roadmap